What Liberals Want By Chilton Williamson

Chilton Williamson,writing for Middle American News  has put his finger on the base hypocrisy that lay at the heart of the Obama Administrations obsessive slanders against the American people who wish to be protected from Mexican violence and identity theft:

"..All too obviously, what the liberal critics, from President Obama down to a demonstrator carrying a green-white-and-red sign, mean by “reform” is amnesty for all illegal aliens in this country and for their extended families remaining outside of it: an amnesty, that is, of future illegal immigrants as well as those 20 million-plus ones presently here, and no control over American borders at all. In short, they want open borders, open to everyone coming to the United States from everywhere.

In order to conceal their true goal, the raisers of the current ruckus have focused  on a single word in SB1070: that little word “sole,” as in, race or ethnicity may not be the “sole” criteria for a law officer’s demand for papers following the original contact between the officer and the person he has stopped for questioning.  “Sole” suggests that skin color may  be a factor in such an instance, a possibility  abhorrent to the morally perfectionist liberal mind, which demands that every rule of procedure (or any other rule) must be certifiably simon-pure and infinitely generalizable in order to  win recognition as having moral validity. Anything short of such  purity amounts, in the present circumstances, to “racial profiling,”  a practice so heinous, in liberal eyes, that everything—including , if necessary, the security of the United States and that of the Western world—deserves to be sacrificed in order to satisfy the prohibition against the Horror.  This one word alone has given the liberal media and the political class the opening they needed to perceive “racist” intent in SB1070,  and thus to condemn the bill outright.  Seizing on that word, they have been able to sniff along the track of “intent” as far as the discovery that 31 of the 35 Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives also voted for a “birther” bill demanding that President Obama produce his birth certificate. (Well, where is that certificate?  Doesn’t the president hold a U.S. passport?  It’s a constitutional issue, after all, and if the throne is indeed occupied by a usurper, the country has a right to know it.)  Since Obama is black, and the allegedly whitebirthers are challenging his right to be President, liberals infer from this that they, like the Tea Party, are racists. But prejudice, like intent, is hard to prove; indeed, unless admitted outright, it can only be inferred. But for a newspaper columnist to infer racism in any white person who opposes a black politician suggests a good deal more prejudice than for a policeman to interrogate a brown man with crispy hair in Arizona does.  The human interrogative mind proceeds from observation to suspicion (based on prejudgment), from suspicion  to the gathering and assembly of facts, and from thence to the formation of a tentative conclusion. By way of the same process, I can easily conclude—and do conclude—that the large majority of nonwhite commentators on the subject of immigration dislike  and resent white people, and that a significant number of white ones, perhaps even a majority of them, do also.  Honi soit qui mal y pense, as the French say: Evil to him who thinks it. There’s a lot of that going on right now, mostly in liberal circles. Then again, there always has been, since liberalism first began.

What am I—what is anyone—to make of this? Only, so far as I can see, that immigration “reform” is a deliberate plot—I use the word advisably—by people who hate the United States, and the people and the culture that created it, to destroy the country and turn the original American people into outcasts and strangers in their own land. True, I concluded as much forty years ago. But in venting their fury over SB1070 and Arizona, they have showed their hand for everyone with eyes to see. It was their own hate that tricked them into doing it—hate, and the abject, mentally destabilizing realization that the Old America has winded the enemy and, after these many decades, is organizing and positioning itself to fight back.  According to a recent (early May) New York Times/CBS poll, 60 percent of the American public either believes that SB1070 did what needs to be done,  or that it does not go far enough. We, the Old Americans—the new revolutionary mob"


"La Raza" runs L.A.
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 8/26/2010 1:03 AM Tacfit Commando wrote:
    I like your style, the fact that your site is a little bit different makes it so interesting, I get fed up of seeing same-old-same-old all of the time. I've just stumbled this page for you
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.